Perfect (Singing) – The Enemy OF The Good?

As I am enjoying this Christmas break, I pondered a blog post. If you have been kind enough to read this blog, you may know that in addition to my Assistant Principal position, I happily teach a class of vocal music. (I reference teaching admins here)

So as the voice instructor at our school and the long time director of our theatre program, I thought I might do a mild holiday rant on a topic that drives me insane.

The common, overused, and blindly accepted use of pitch correction on both recorded and live music is the topic at hand. I am going to hazard a guess that many people don’t even know that the singer they are listening to has had their voice completely altered electronically to make it perfectly on pitch. But most of what we hear today is pitch corrected.

It is so easy to do.  It is not expensive. It is easy to use and overuse.

Take the hit show Glee. The show has a cast of very talented singers. My students love it. I like the show as well. But listen carefully. The producers have chosen to make the pitch perfect. On certain notes, you hear the warbly robotic sound caused by pitch correction

Here is an example of some artists using autotune. Listen closely.

Examples of autotune

And now the cast of glee uncorrected live at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia duting the World Series. Sound great, don’t they?

Cast of Glee Sings The National Anthem in Philadelphia

Most producers use a product called autotune. It makes life easy in the studio. All you need is for the singer to do one take, and then leave. The engineer then can correct all of the flaws and there you have it, perfectly in tune vocals!  But isn’t that what we want?

Think of the Beatles, Motown, live theatre, good old cover bands, and all of the acts that have done it without being altered.  Think about it, if Bob Dylan was autotuned, would he be special?  No he would not.  His different tonality and imperfection makes the music real.

If the producer only asks the singer for one take, is that their best? Is that the one with the most passion? Not likely. And we teach kids to sing. We guide them on the path to good technique. We have them sing in groups and solo. We celebrate the unique sounds of their voices.  We want them to sing in tune. We want them to harmonize well.  And you know what? They can do it!  All on their own. They audition, perform, take on roles perform in front of audiences.

But if we, as a listening society, accept the use of pitch correction as a positive use of technology, then what are we saying about the craft of singing?  Will our students be measured against altered voices?  I hope not.

A talented singer should be a talented singer. Not someone who has been packaged and processed into one. And when I read of performers using autotune in live concerts, well that is simply cheating. You either can sing your songs or you can’t. Pitch correction needs to be rejected. We need to demand true performances. Perfectly tuned singing does not mean it is better. Those who believe that accepting a bit of a robotic sound is acceptable because there will be no “off; notes doesn’t understand the power and passion of an unaltered voice, flaws and all.

To my students, keep singing! Really singing.

Happy New Year!

Building The Barricade

I have not blogged in awhile.  I have not spent as much time as I would like with my Personal Learning network on Twitter. . But not because I haven’t wanted to.  What I have been doing has been so rewarding, challenging and fun.

One of the things I do at my school is to serve as the director of our theatre program.  We produce 2 musicals a year and involve hundreds of students in the shows. We just finished a two weekend run of our production of LES MISERABLES SCHOOL EDITION. The show was a huge success. And the journey to that success was a tremendous experience.

There are so many great examples of students doing incredible things, but in the interest of brevity, (I will try) I will highlight one.

The show requires the construction of a barricade. It is one of the key elements. It has to be huge, structurally sound, and be able to spin on a turntable.

So we began.  I explained to the stage crew members how to construct the supporting structure of the barricade.  I was very specific as to how we would support the whole thing from the ground to 8 feet in the air on the 20 foot width of the structure. Then I emailed parents asking for any old furniture that they would be willing to part with. Wow, they were generous!

So, once the supporting structure was finished the learning fun began. My student leaders asked, “OK, what do you want us to do with all of this?” I thought for a minute, and then said: “Make this thing look like a pile of junk in the street, but it needs to be structurally sound and climbable. Oh, and you need some hidden doors so that the crew can get in and out of the barricade. (It was hollow inside)

They looked at me for more instructions, but I told them that I had to work on another project on the stage and suggested that they use their imagination and skill to create something great. I expressed my confidence in them to complete the job successfully.

Stage crew building the barricade

Stage crew building the barricade

They went to work. They finished it, they climbed it, they tested it, they painted it, and it was THEIR barricade.

They made hidden doors from old chests of drawers.  They converted desks, tables, chairs, drawers, old lumber, and barrels into steps and standing locations for the actors. They made changes where needed. They learned from mistakes. They worked collaboratively. They worked through creative disagreements. They owned what they learned.

This is another reason why I love the arts in schools.  From the onstage performers to the musicians and stage crew, theater in schools provides such a valuable learning experience.

Anyone want to share their own learning with the arts experiences? Feel free to comment and thanks for taking the time to stop by and read.